Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Bolton on Obama Winning Peace Prize

Title:

Bolton on Obama Winning Peace Prize

Published: Fri, 9 Oct 2009

Description: Former Amb. John Bolton on whether Obama's Nobel Peace Prize will complicate war efforts.

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" There's no doubt in my mind that president Barack Hussein Obama does not -- the Nobel Peace Prize. I say that but is not a good is it not a good thing that American. Being rewarded no matter how undeserving for promoting world peace that I write that former US ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton joins us now. Which gives you say your idea intro. What what about it got me these -- not. It caught between a rock and a hard place right now in general the crystal requesting 40000 more troops and now the world saying -- mr. Obama's president John. -- story here your -- peaceful man."

" Well it said I think a continuation of a long series of decisions by the Nobel prize committee. Making really very political choices choices that happened to comport with -- view of the way the world should work. Over a period of twenty years or more now. And I think this was a very clear signal in the line of Jimmy Carter in 2002 Al Gore in 2007. Now. Barack Obama that you Americans better get the point of what kind of Americans we like over here."

" And consider what about the premise the chairman of the Nobel committee was doing the new circuit this morning. Talking about you know -- decision to. I'll give the president the Nobel Peace Prize and saying you know look this is something if it's along what you're saying this is something that we try to boost the stature. Of the person we nominated not so much for the accomplishments achieved already. But for the -- potential. Albeit compliment his agenda they noted climate change. They noted. Global diplomacy. Reaching out to your enemies that thus far the US has criticized. For going it alone. This basically is what they weren't. That endorsing."

" Well it's very touching they think they need help the president of the United States these these five but members of the Norwegian parliament. -- but you know the fact is historically the Nobel. Peace prize like the other prizes has been for achievement Theodore Roosevelt in 1906 for ending the war between Russia and Japan Woodrow Wilson that they. Treaty of their side. But it has been in the past twenty years giving awards to people that there there trying to send a political signal that that's the politicize nation are referred to view of how world affairs ought to be conducted. It's based on their own ideological leanings and I think that approach actually has cheapened the Nobel Peace Prize on --"

" ambassador you know it. I understand that there there -- political by nature any awards going to be some political what what confuses me is that the Nobel Peace Prize actually can tell demonstrate the Republicans and Democrats."

" You know they have a they have a very discerning -- on that score Theodore Roosevelt thing just about the last Republican who qualified. But it also goes in in their choices of international organization you know as the United Nations effectiveness has gone down. The number of awards it's received has gone up. Today kicked regular mention you in the 1990s she's an indigenous Guatemalan. Writer. Not entirely clear what that has to do with international peace but but it was to send -- signal of their disapproval of military governments in Latin America is so. It's a particular view of the world it's a view of many in the European -- And I think it saying basically to Americans haven't you've got the point yet these are the kinds of Americans we'd like these are the kind you should elect not not those other kind."

" Yeah that's an interstate and it's just -- thought a lot of people were talking today about whether this is more -- vote in favor of the Obama is a bug. Peace policy or I'd vote against the prior administration the bush policy where do you stand on that. Well I."

" I think it's a philosophical. Snub. A view of assertive American leadership that it's an endorsement. Of the Obama style like calling the first post American president because you know he's above all that patriotism stuff. And I think get away the Nobel committee's trying to reward that that's that's part of why so politicized. In his decision making."

" Bassinet because it's cheap shot that he's not patriotic. Combined. -- Leno I think holly to the same politics that the Nobel peace surprise -- you're accusing that committee and do it you're sitting there doing the same thing with that comment there."

" Right I think I think what I'm doing is so reflecting on the content of Evan Thomas the Newsweek editor. Who mentioned at the time of Obama's speech on the there's Obama sort of above all the nations source sort of like god that's what I mean by post American and."

" Ambassador we're just about out of time I got one final question for and that is who would you have given it to if you -- the Nobel peace committee all to yourself what would you -- donated one point four million dollar student would you -- the price --"

" I wouldn't get enterprise anybody this year they have the option of not doing that and you know when there's not an obvious winner I think it helps the prizes. Prestige not to get that out gratuitously."

" I'm giving it to myself."

" Happy hour maybe like yeah okay okay let's rethink that and thank you the president is donating one point four million to charity ambassador John ball and thank you for joining us with your point of view on this the military thank you very much they --"

More Videos From FOX Business
Does a Weak U.S. Economy Help Our Enemies?

Does a Weak U.S. Economy Help Our Enemies?

Iran to test its first nuclear power plant.

Video|Wed, 25 Feb 2009|More from America's Nightly Scoreboard
|north koreafound at0:04, 3:11, 4:20, 6:16, 6:30

to wake up in this administration on secretary Clinton's recent trip to South Korea she said that the bush administration's policy added to and was exactly the right policy a policy of pursuing. Negotiations so it's pretty clear that's the direction she's going in. And the North Korean response perhaps any day now will be to watch a Taepodong two missile which if it. Tell us tell us why that's significant ambassador. Because if it succeeds it has the range to reach Alaska obviously can reach Japan South Korea it's another step forward for the North Korean. Ballistic missile program which is not motivated by an abstract interest in nuclear physics. But -- Astro physics but by the desire to be able deliver nuclear weapons on target you have a claimants for space exploration and that's terrific Claudia as as diverse as our enemies are mean -- they are Asian enemies urged Latin America . They do. Form this axis. And at times like this when we York undergoing a lot of economic strength. What do you think Iran and North Korea are going to do together. To try to 22 to harm us to harm the US.
Rat pack again and this time. Our focus is on Iran and North Korea the US almost totally engrossed in our economic woes now does that make this an ideal moment. For our enemies to take advantage tonight. One member of our rat -- Iran is poised to flip the switch on that nation's first nuclear power plant while another. North Korea could be preparing to launch a long range missile. Will America's enemies all of them take advantage of our economic weakness let's
I would bet you they are in fact they've just seeing North Korea . Play us -- America for fools for years yet they've got a model to follow and what they've seen is that if you pursue. Nuclear material nuclear weapons America will flinch. You got up and still. Saddam Hussein was overthrown there was a period where they really have things to worry about. In 2004 America went out of the regime change business conduct these surrender of his nuclear kid. In fear of the fate of Saddam was the last surrendered that we've seen. And since then. North Korea's got ahead Iran is going ahead serious tried to go ahead this is the way it and it actually needs some decisive
negotiation. Can solve the problem a nuclear Iran and and a nuclear North Korea . So I don't think he needs to hear too much more he thinks he's got time he thinks diplomacy. Is going to
the nuclear godfather the Middle East and in much the way the North Korea has managed to. You keep that that regime the regime of North Korea has stayed in power by a mix of pursuing these weapons that makes them big men on the block. And extorting concessions
Fed's Big Pay Day

Fed's Big Pay Day

With news swirling the Central Bank turned a profit from the crisis, we break down what it means for you

Video|Mon, 31 Aug 2009|More from Web Exclusive
|general motorsfound at31:39

Very lucrative pensions. That. Has been allowed to continue their -- like General Motors but with a government monopoly. So there are a number of challenges the post office has some of which --
American Journalists Sentenced in N. Korea

American Journalists Sentenced in N. Korea

Melanie Kirkpatrick, deputy editor of the Wall Street Journal's editorial page, weighs in on whether the American journalists being held in N. Korea are being used as financial blackmail.

Video|Tue, 9 Jun 2009|More from FOX Business
|north koreafound at0:03, 0:49, 1:16, 2:02, 2:28

airplanes I might add. Our being talked about as part of the United Nations sanctions in response to North Korea's nuclear test last month these -- put journalists give him leverage. They duality that forms and getting. It if but if there is somehow
American journalists sentenced to a dozen years of hard labor in North Korea Melanie Kirkpatrick is the deputy editorial page editor of The Wall Street Journal and she joins me now. It it will financial program I want to centering in on the financial -- I don't believe it's that. Is it possible that it will be a blackmailed via. North Korea ceases to journalists and then says if you attempt to impose financial sanctions -- restrict our money would do something nasty that
of that's happened before in the ninety's we paid some money sent. Bill Richardson the governor of New Mexico to North Korea and the American came home. But I think there's a larger issue which is the nuclear program. And the United States didn't -- financial sanctions on North Korea in a the first part of the Bush Administration and they worked.
looks more than that flavor of it was it is essentially denied North Korea access student to the international financial system if you deny. A country access to the United States financial system and say you know anybody who deals with North Korea is going to be. Suspects to us nobody wants to deal with North Korea and that's what the Bush Administration that until 2006 when it lifted that sanctions.
ever seems to change. China will not play instrument. Surely get in North Korea as it is a Chinese clients to eat the Chinese do nothing about yes.
By the same time China is worried about having a democratic unified. North Korea . On its borders down the road if this is that -- do well not necessarily a look at how quickly east Germany
Of integrating east Germany into -- I don't know the cost of North Korea into south through peace and an extra work. --
Yes and no one I think that North Korea is the source of cheap labor it is could be a source of cheap labor for the region replacing. China itself as.
it's more likely that we could send the high profile American to North Korea . And to -- and and bank now total. Al Gore who is the cofounder of the media organization for which they work