Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

34 Tarp-Aided Banks Unable to Pay Government

Title:

34 Tarp-Aided Banks Unable to Pay Government

Published: Fri, 9 Oct 2009

Description: Red Ink Watch: Ely & Co's Bert Ely on banks' inability to pay back Tarp funds.

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" Next 35 banks that took top of the bailout money on now unable to make better installment payments back to the government. Problems for just those banks all for the whole industry. That's after banking -- book. The moment evening and company. But I think I've got a number right at 358. Banks was supposed to make dividend payments to the government. On the top money they'd gotten they can't make those payments med flight for just double the whole business."

" Well I think first call with regard to the 35 banks it may be prudent on her part. To delay. Payment of these dividends because the dividend payment reduces their capital. Many of these banks are having a capital issues at this time. It's that is if they don't -- those dividends to the government they just don't have the pay him at this time but they will crew. There are of course broader problems in the banking industry were continuing to see a relatively high level failures. There is rapidly growing concern about the problems in commercial real estate lending. And we don't expect the problem to our resolve itself. You know within the coming months."

" Yet but that's something we've really concentrated on this program the common problem the coming real problem with commercial real estate. You think about is that may be the big reason. Why banks are holding back capital not paying back the government as that is that may be able to it's commercial realists like this holiday. Well."

" First some companies that is undoubtedly. The case but a number of the banks are also dealing with. Lingering effects of of the housing crisis home equity loans and so forth. But. I would suggested that they actually prudent for these companies at this time. To not pay the dividend and instead to hang on their capital to help cushion them. As they're working through their credit all the problems of all kinds I'm going to blog I I see how it's prudent for them to hold onto that capital. But is it a signal. -- depot bull big a problem that's going to hit us at some point throughout the entire banking industry. Well I think we have a lot of other signals to I think this is just one of many of the continuing credit quality problems in the banking industry particularly as they are merging with regard to the commercial real estate so I don't want to read. Too much into that one particular signal given all the others that we have out there I just why how how strong recovery you can have if the banks are holding back capital -- check it out into the general economy would -- in the that would restrain economic growth. Well the big picture are willing to lend and I don't see this is relating to that I think the problem for many of the banks is finding good credit that is finding good borrowers particularly at a time when many of the better borrowers. Don't want to borrow they're trying to strengthen our balance sheets are paying down the credit card loans and so. Many people who do want to borrow in fact shouldn't be able to borrow because they are. The weaker credit but -- thank you very much indeed the banking expert affecting."

More Videos From FOX Business
Alexis Glick: Everyone's Picking on Goldman

Alexis Glick: Everyone's Picking on Goldman

FBN weighs in on the outrage surrounding Goldman Sachs and executive pay.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|goldman sachsfound at0:26

on my thoughts on this -- second. I understand the outreach about Goldman how much money they guide to whether or not being American taxpayers save them their relationship with the government. Isn't reason to be upset about some of that stuff I get it but the end of the day. Everybody is picking on Goldman Sachs wouldn't shareholders . Are telling what are the most successful companies. On the planet. What they think they should get paid. Things have gone too
Patent Protection Hits Highest Court

Patent Protection Hits Highest Court

Attorney Michael Jakes on why he took patent protection to the Supreme Court.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|warsawfound at0:50

But as you as you say it's exactly that. These two inventors Warsaw on bills he came up with a great idea for hedging. The commodity risks in the energy market and to provide consumers with a fixed bill they applied for a patent back in 1997. But they've been shut out of the door they haven't been able to have their patent examiner on the merits. Because the Court of Appeals has said it's not the right kind of invention it doesn't. It's not tied to a machine or transform particular subject matter that's the issue we took to the Supreme Court
Nip, Tuck and Tax

Nip, Tuck and Tax

Facial Plastic Surgeon Dr. Daniel Rousso on taxing Botox and cosmetic surgery.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|botox injectionsfound at0:19, 1:48, 2:52

to mention some details here about how much. Four point seven million Botox injections last year average cost per visit about 400 bucks it's about one point eight. Billion dollars if they tax. These Botox injections and they're talking about taxing other things like breast implants and tummy tucks. Do you think there will be fewer of these
tax on the middle class could it. It's it's often portrayed he's Botox injections as something that just the wealthy use. Is that your experience.
looking to tax something it's going to be the elective stuff like Botox injections .