Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Is the Government Over Regulating?

Title:

Is the Government Over Regulating?

Published: Wed, 15 Jul 2009

Description: Capitalistpig's Jonathan Hoenig, U.S. PIRG Federal Office Director Gary Kalman and former White House Press Secretary Dana Perino on all the newly-proposed financial regulations.

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" In the house financial services committee is holding hearings this week on the administration's financial regulatory reform proposals. -- several financial planning consumer protection and state regulatory groups sent letters to house leaders expressing concern. About one suggested reform. That the Securities and Exchange Commission be granted authority to acquired fiduciary duty for any broker dealer or investment adviser who gives investment life. Legislation would also apparently SEC to examine and -- hand forms of compensation. That encourage financial experts to -- investors. Into products that may not be. And your best interest is is all part of the tangled web of mean regulation. Turning now to debate the merits or lack era. Jonathan Hoenig managing director of capitalist pig it's fun and merits not on there I Gary Coleman -- of the federal office director. At US target date of rehashing the formal white house Press Secretary and Fox News contributor good morning on you guys you diamonds are you laughing Dana because some I think I know where he feels about regulation."

" But let me know how do you tell the audience. I'm registered -- feel about that."

" John how well Alexis I. I am sorry I tell -- out if the free market didn't cause the crisis and how this proposed regulation. Won't prevent another one from occurring we all these troubled firm you've been talking about for weeks now AIG while I'm new Freddie Fannie Mae off. These were all highly regulated firms and if you really want to look to the cause look to the government in a -- involvement in the marketplace it's billion manipulating interest rates a subsidized housing markets to -- reinvestment act. That's where the government should be focusing not on regulating private productive business but -- the regulations that have already gone a strong all right but. You know the premise now the administration essentially that business is full of productive idiots who are self destructive. And that regulators know the right way to structure everything from mortgage rates. To interest rates how loans are made and how investments are made it won't work. Gary how do you feel about what -- I had to --"

" Well I think over the last 25 years we've seen is a hustler stepping back. Regulatory framework and so."

" We're calling for is not what we would consider over regulation but basic common sense proposals increased transparency making sure that."

" The risk in the market is reasonable. Warren Buffett famously said."

" That -- markets are great but they're prone to -- we're just trying to make sure there's some reasonable checks."

" On the access. Tina well I've always wanted to meet Jonathan's and out of step closer feel better about -- how. And I think -- to make a convincing case. I mean it's not the businesses don't think that there should be some sort of regulation but. Washington has a tendency to over react in a crisis. And that's what you're seeing now and they're trying to pull off any low hanging fruit. And I think that we should listen to people like Jonathan and other people in business. Because people who are making decisions in Washington really haven't run businesses and that's a serious problem that we have -- GAAP. And I would go back to something that the other -- which is that. And then there's been this 25 years of walking back from regulation I don't think that there are many business people would actually agree. You know it's interesting Gary because war debt word we're discussing right now particularly with the Federal Reserve Bank. Is actually giving them more power not less power. And yet a lot of people believe that the power they already have they have not used appropriately. So are we walking into perhaps very dangerous territory. By giving them what already seems like ending -- manpower."

" Well it take a look at it you know we talk about these things in generalizations but if you take some specific examples take for example the credit card."

" Reform bill that just passed. Many of the banks said that that was a very onerous bill. I was gonna stop profits credit card companies were going to you know go under -- not be able to do their money it make their profits."

" what we're talking about these things such as. Credit card companies changing -- due dates on your bills so that you would be forced to pay fees because he would Haley when you didn't know it."

" Things like that there are literally skimming consumers that don't know whether -- of them don't know that the rules are being changed so. Hate to say that we don't have some basic consumer protections in place I think is wrong I think the other thing that we're looking at on some of these larger issues."

" Is also that we need to make sure they were protecting taxpayers we've seen -- well liked what is happening the last few months last year."

" Where there's excessive bail out. Institutions that we deemed too big to fail. That you -- thing here is that Adaptec have a prayer."

" Acting but yet how about protecting business and then I mean our business -- on your long list of of people you want to protect. Because -- what regulation really does is punish not criminals but innocent businessman. Just like Dana and I hate to say it in -- sarbanes Oxley which of course is enacted under your former Boston -- or president. Is an enormous burden continues to be an enormous burden. I'm small businessman just the ones who were trying to provide jobs and and grow the economy so. This notion that somehow the economy will grow there won't be anywhere financial realities if just we just get the right regulation."

" It is sparks yeah I think John McCain in fairness. This is stem cell they -- His got to be some culpability which he'd come through one of the largest financial crisis in US history and say we're not going to do anything about it. I mean investors. Dot com one word in this -- it in what happened over the back I mean look at money market accounts. -- really money market accounts they aren't investing in the horrible sub prime related mortgages. And we got to do something about the awareness to legal."

" You know -- to be the ones that were given you know credit hi credit ratings by the monopoly of the credit rating agencies an asset if by the government. Are those and I mean you know it's it's suggest again that the market with some freewheeling you know free enterprise that -- fellow. Part. Is just not true the markets the financial markets have been highly regulated for four decades and of course the more the government is not -- control them the more erratic and volatile that the."

More Videos From FOX Business
Will the Gov't Let Go of Fannie and Freddie?

Will the Gov't Let Go of Fannie and Freddie?

Former Fannie Mae Chief Credit Officer Edward Pinto on why the government will likely continue its control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Video|Thu, 31 Dec 2009|More from FOX Business
|fannie maefound at0:06

in the weeks and months to come it's continued bigger support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac . What good could come out of all this government involvement housing market . And the bad. For the good the bad and the ugly. At and I was joining me former chief credit officer at Fannie Mae from 1987 to 89 and a mortgage industry consultant. And it's always great you'd be here. So back today Fannie Mae Freddie Mac . And the Federal Housing Administration. All our our mortgage market we've nationalized it it's about 90% of mortgages that are made today.
Ex-Fannie Mae Exec. on New Rental Program

Ex-Fannie Mae Exec. on New Rental Program

Fmr. Fannie Mae Chief Credit Officer Edward Pinto on the plan to rent foreclosed homes back to borrowers.

Video|Thu, 5 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|fannie maefound at0:21, 0:55, 2:58, 4:45

his -- Fannie Mae and and Freddie Mac as well are they going to wind up big landlords. Because this problem Fannie Mae has announced is for a year. Do you think it'll last longer than that because that seems to be the trend in
taxpayers even more money joining us now on the phone is former Fannie Mae chief credit officer. Ed -- Ed is this hay -- out or Fannie may to prevent it from realizing steep losses trying
big hit. A -- and and pushing down into the future. And Fannie Mae . Is uniquely qualified try to do that. They can borrow money very cheaply. Given that their government agency. And that they're going
you you're Robert are you going to talk to Ed -- former Fannie Mae chief credit arm.
What's Next for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

What's Next for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

What's Next for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

Video|Fri, 22 Aug 2008|More from Money for Breakfast
|freddie macfound at0:01, 3:56, 6:28

Fannie Mae and Freddie it's very different in the rest of the financials it needs to make it clear that it stands behind the dead and that's the same whether it'll it'll stand behind through the end of next year. One of the best ways to do that would be to start buying some Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the Mac -- about paper. Because there's there's a widening point spread you know essentially the treasury would be barring -- treasure -- and loaning. At a at a somewhat higher rate eighty basis points think it would make a profit on the difference. That would likely bring the spread down from eighty basis points back down at 65 where it belongs. And that that would be useful it really wouldn't put the treasury at any greater risk. Because -- Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac expire -- capital and they have to step in. That they're stock did this stuff bailing out the bondholders anyway to that
It's been a losing week for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the -- government backed mortgage providers which hold almost half of all outstanding US mortgages watch their shares plummet this week. Fannie shares fell 39%. Freddie shares fell 46% this at the rally late day yesterday. Now Wall Street placing bets on how -- the US Treasury Department will allow. The lenders to think the point Yeltsin now join me if I return he he's director of US interest rates strategy at Credit Suisse securities. And -- Washington DC -- of the doctor Peter Ritchie an economist with the university. Of Merrill and great to see
the least could quell some concerns from overseas you saw in the Freddie Mac five year debt offering earlier this week. That there was still 30% foreign demand now that's down a lot from previously but