Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

The Future of GM

Title:

The Future of GM

Published: Fri, 22 May 2009

Description: Rob Bovarnick, founder of Bovarnick & Associates, on the uncertain fate of General Motors

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" more what the future GM may look like we're joined by Bob Robb Bob Barnett he is founder of a mark and associates Roth I gotta tell you that for all let. The accusations. About to trampling on the legitimate rights of creditors that we heard from Chrysler it sounds like you could double life for what's coming -- GM credit holders."

" It's a little bit for different gave -- little detail why as you just heard. The bondholders are unsecured when he came to Chrysler in the hedge funds they were security there at the top of the food chain. The bond -- toward the bottom of the food -- so they don't have nearly the amount of leverage. And as you just heard. If this company goes into bankruptcy they run the risk of coming out with zero however if I was representing the bondholders I would recommend them to hold firm. Because right now what are they getting. Very close to zero and so what is their downside you don't think frankly isn't that great. So I think that they should stand firm and not a cave into the administration. Into it. The UAW is not really the UAW -- trust for the pay engineers and try to get a better."

" Deal rob you've been a proponent of chapter eleven bankruptcy I believe you've gone on the record about that Ted because you sort of feel that -- at the US Airways and Kmart. Went into which they were able to at least emerge in some way shape or form but is it is GM in a position. To file a quick bankruptcy and sort of surgically get in and then get out."

" there's a huge difference between. GM. And the airline industry and even Chrysler. But the biggest difference if you look at as an airline industry from the standpoint of the consumer the sort of a one off. I'm going to take an airline flight -- and I'm not. When it comes to Chrysler Chrysler. -- was not doing that well anyway GM is is a huge companies 1% of the economy and one of the things that's most important for. The consumers and GM is the ability to continue going there either to get new cars and more importantly. Warranty claims to get parts of whatever may be so there is a significant difference between GM and any other bank."

" we have rob let me ask you coordinate all the we have seen from Chrysler GM despite the differences. Does all of this send a message to other bondholders and creditors from other corporation -- there there's a chilling message going out throughout the credit system in the United States because of what's been happening."

" Dave I couldn't agree with you more I think it sends a horrible message. -- one of the things that people have to understand is when you when you think of bond holders and quite often in in bankruptcy cases bondholders are large institutions that's not totally the case here. Many of the bond holders are people from middle America people who invested 70000 dollars in bonds thinking that they would get a good solid safe return. And now they find that there's 70000 dollar investment is going to be worth pennies. So really what's happening here is it's not the big entities that are being hurt but it just. Man woman on the street and my when my challenges with the administration is there was talk about wanting to take care of those people were here they seem to be forcing their hand to make those people take the brunt of the problem rob."

" The -- thank you very much -- you -- sooner rather than later June 1 is the deadline we will indeed but again a lot of molecule -- have these things not just big bad wolf."

More Videos From FOX Business
Alexis Glick: Everyone's Picking on Goldman

Alexis Glick: Everyone's Picking on Goldman

FBN weighs in on the outrage surrounding Goldman Sachs and executive pay.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|goldman sachsfound at0:26

on my thoughts on this -- second. I understand the outreach about Goldman how much money they guide to whether or not being American taxpayers save them their relationship with the government. Isn't reason to be upset about some of that stuff I get it but the end of the day. Everybody is picking on Goldman Sachs wouldn't shareholders . Are telling what are the most successful companies. On the planet. What they think they should get paid. Things have gone too
Patent Protection Hits Highest Court

Patent Protection Hits Highest Court

Attorney Michael Jakes on why he took patent protection to the Supreme Court.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|warsawfound at0:50

But as you as you say it's exactly that. These two inventors Warsaw on bills he came up with a great idea for hedging. The commodity risks in the energy market and to provide consumers with a fixed bill they applied for a patent back in 1997. But they've been shut out of the door they haven't been able to have their patent examiner on the merits. Because the Court of Appeals has said it's not the right kind of invention it doesn't. It's not tied to a machine or transform particular subject matter that's the issue we took to the Supreme Court
Nip, Tuck and Tax

Nip, Tuck and Tax

Facial Plastic Surgeon Dr. Daniel Rousso on taxing Botox and cosmetic surgery.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|botox injectionsfound at0:19, 1:48, 2:52

to mention some details here about how much. Four point seven million Botox injections last year average cost per visit about 400 bucks it's about one point eight. Billion dollars if they tax. These Botox injections and they're talking about taxing other things like breast implants and tummy tucks. Do you think there will be fewer of these
tax on the middle class could it. It's it's often portrayed he's Botox injections as something that just the wealthy use. Is that your experience.
looking to tax something it's going to be the elective stuff like Botox injections .