Published November 13, 2012
What's the most dangerous animal known to man? Bears, perhaps? Or sharks?
Nah -- in North America, at least, it's Bambi.
Every year, vehicle crashes involving deer cause around 200 deaths, tens of thousands of injuries and upward of $3.6 billion in vehicle damage, according to the Insurance Information Institute. The trade group says each accident results in an average auto insurance claim of more than $3,000. While highway reports indicate there are 300,000 deer crashes each year, the Federal Highway Administration has told Congress that researchers think the actual number could run as high as 1 to 2 million.
Ohio Insurance Institute spokesman Mitch Wilson says deer-vehicle collisions spike from October to January, the height of deer mating and migration season. "They're most active at dusk and dawn, from 5 p.m. to midnight, and 5 a.m. to 8 a.m.," he says. "Of course, those are times when cars are normally on the road, too."
As many an unlucky motorist will attest, you don't necessarily have to run into a deer to be involved in a crash with one. "A lot of times, you may not hit the deer; the deer may hit you or leap onto your car. That happens in many, many cases," Wilson says.
Startled drivers who collide with deer, elk, moose and other hoofed mammals are often equally surprised by how their auto insurance treats their claim.
Logic might suggest that such crashes would fall under the collision portion of your policy, which pays for damage to your vehicle if you hit (or are hit) by another vehicle or object. But instead, animal-related damage is typically treated as an "other than collision" claim under your comprehensive coverage, or "comp," which covers so-called acts of God such as wind, hail and flood, as well as fire, vandalism and theft.
State Farm spokesman Dick Luedke says your relative likelihood of hitting a deer, which his company's underwriters calculate annually by state based on State Farm's claims reports, could be a compelling reason to carry comp as well as collision coverage.
"Most people, though not very many State Farm customers, have one of those and not the other," Luedke says "Either you have them both or you have neither. When you have an older car, sometimes you don't purchase the physical-damage coverages, but more people with newer cars definitely have both."
Then there's the issue of deductibles. Drivers often raise their deductibles on collision and/or comp to save on premiums, but a deer collision can throw a set of antlers into that cost-cutting strategy. You'll ask yourself, "Did I raise my collision deductible to $1,000, or was it my comp deductible?" That's something you'll want to know if you hit a deer.
Having to satisfy a large comp deductible before your auto insurance starts paying will help determine whether it's wise to file the claim or pay for the repairs yourself. Another important factor in that decision is your claims history, Wilson says.
"If you or your kids have had a string of previous claims, a company may say you've exceeded their internal guidelines for this type of policy, and in some states they may nonrenew you for that," he says. "Say you have a $1,000 deductible and $1,500 in damage. Do you want to possibly jeopardize your insurability with this company by filing this $1,500 claim, or do you eat the $500 and not turn it in?"
But he says insurers won't raise rates for a one-time deer-related claim because they don't hold drivers at fault in deer crashes, which have become increasingly common.
Driving tips to avoid deer:
Sources: Insurance Information Institute. Mitch Wilson, Ohio Insurance Institute.
Marcel Huijser, senior research ecologist for the Western Transportation Institute at Montana State University, says deer-vehicle collisions have increased by 50% over the past couple of decades as suburban sprawl has encroached farther into deer country.
"We have and want wildlife, we have and want roads, so if we can't get rid of one or the other, we're pretty much going to have wildlife- vehicle collisions," he says.
Attempts to reduce accidents with those familiar yellow-and-black "Deer Crossing" road signs have been as ineffective as the deer whistles that some people have taken to mounting on their cars.
"What do you do with a sign that says 'Watch out for deer next 34 miles'? You forget about it 100 yards later," says Huijser. "Same with whistles. There is no evidence that they work, but people like them because they're inexpensive, and it seems like they're doing something."
Of the more than 40 mitigation measures Huijser has studied to curb deer-vehicle collisions, he says only two can make a dent in the annual costs and the human suffering that go along with them.
"Wildlife fencing in combination with (overpasses) and underpasses provides safe (highway) crossing opportunities" for deer, he says. "The other is animal detection systems, technology deployed along the side of the road that detects large animals as they approach and activates warning signs for drivers. ??? Some of these systems can bring from 50% up to nearly 100% reduction in collisions in some areas."
Huijser says auto insurance companies could save money and lives by forming an alliance that would partner with local governments to implement these two mitigation strategies where deer crashes are most prevalent.
"You have three arguments pleading for implementation measures: human safety, nature conservation, and the cold, hard dollar," he says. "It's actually costing more money to do nothing."
Copyright 2012, Bankrate Inc.