It takes a lot of parts to make an Abrams main battle tank -- but together, they form a whole. Source: Wikimedia Commons.
Continue Reading Below
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. ... Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
If you live in America today, you can't not be familiar with first General then President Eisenhower's famous "military-industrial complex speech" (actually his farewell address). Intended as a warning to taxpayers to beware of too-close ties between the Pentagon and the companies that serve it, the speech also contains an observationthat could be invaluable to investors in defense companies.
Simply put: The defense industry may look like it's made up of individual companies -- but it's really just one big "complex."
Parts that add up to a whole
Take the Abrams main battle tank as an example. General Dynamicsbuilds the tank, but Rheinmetall makes the gun, American Ordnance the shells that go into the gun, and Honeywellthe engine. All four companies (and more) must cooperate to get the tank built.
For that matter, if General Dynamics ever stopped making tanks,Textron or BAE Systems could step in to fill the gap. And the same holds true for the Pentagon's other armored vehicles, for its aircraft, and for its warships.
Continue Reading Below
American fighter jets are built by Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman. General Dynamics and Huntington Ingalls both build our destroyers and submarines. When one defense company loses a "bid" to build a weapons system, it can still often win work on other aspects of the project.
Figuring out which defense stocks to watch may seem a difficult task, then. But often, the individual companies that make up the defense industry act more like parts of a unified "complex." Individual defense companies may win or lose specific contracts, but no one really loses the Pentagon's business -- at least not for long.
What it means to investors
After all, with well over $500 billion in money to spend every year, there's plenty to go around. One way or another, chances are good that every defense contractor will eventually get its "fair share" of the loot. And herein lies our opportunity as investors.
How? If you spend enough time looking at valuations on defense contractors, you'll notice that they tend to circle certain "mean" numbers. For example, right now, many of the biggest defense contractors sell for valuations of about 17 or 18 times earnings. General Dynamics costs 17 times earnings. Boeing, 18. Northrop Grumman? 16.8. Huntington Ingalls -- 17.8. And as I've pointed out in the past, historically, the valuations on most defense contractors tend to circle around a price of one-times their annual sales -- sometimes a bit higher, sometimes lower, but almost always returning to the mean.
This suggests that, if you're investing in the defense industry for the long term, there are two stocks to watch now if you want to profit from the tendency of defense contractors to revert to the mean.
Right now, enthusiasm over the defense industry, driven by events in Ukraine, in Southeast Asia, and in the Middle East, has most defense contractors selling for valuations above one-times sales. But there are two stocks to watch in particular: Huntington Ingalls, which holds the contract to build America's newest class of supercarriers, and L-3 Communications , a specialist in high-tech sensors and electronic warfare, both cost about 0.8 times sales. If these two companies "revert to the mean" valuation of one-times sales, then each could produce profits on the order of 25% for their shareholders.
Similarly, with most defense contractors today selling for about 17 or 18 times earnings, there may be a value to be found in shares of Raytheon , which costs less than 15 times earnings. The company's business model, which focuses on selling consumable rockets and missiles to operators of weapons systems around the globe, is red-hot right now. In fact, at a time when U.S. defense spending is in decline, at last report, Raytheon gets a greater percentage of its sales from outside U.S. borders than just about any other defense contractor in America.
The upshot for investors
Investing in defense companies is more an art than a science. There's certainly no law that says defense stocks must revert to the mean -- only an observation that they often do just that. If you're looking for a handful of defense stocks to watch, in hopes that a reversion to the mean will reward you, I think Huntington Ingalls, L-3 Communications, and Raytheon are a good place to start.
The article The 3 Best Defense Stocks to Watch originally appeared on Fool.com.
More than just "watching,"Rich Smithactually already owns shares of Raytheon Company.You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handleTMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 342 out of more than 75,000 rated members. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright 1995 - 2015 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.